Western media say Russia blew up the Nord Stream. However why would Moscow destroy the pipelines it spent billions of {dollars} on constructing? — RT World Information

It is easy to see who benefited from the destruction of infrastructure, and it isn’t the state-run vitality large Gazprom

A number of days after information of the explosions, the small print surrounding the intentional sabotage of two Nord Stream pipelines stay opaque and unsure, though the Western media is bound of 1 factor – Moscow itself is guilty.

That is proper, the writers and editors both imagine, or are pretending to imagine, that Russia has blown up the infrastructure that billions of {dollars} had been invested in its building. In the identical nation they routinely, and falsely, smear it because the “mafia state”.

One wonders why they stopped to think about what sort of crime syndicate would destroy one among its primary income sources? Particularly after spending greater than €23 billion on infrastructure building, in line with Gazprom’s personal statements.

In fact, this may require self-awareness. However there’s little time for that once they have preaching to evangelise.

Moscow, because it occurs, believes that the reality lies elsewhere. As President Vladimir Putin mentioned on Friday, “Those that profit are actually accountable,” Alluding to the involvement of what he referred to as “Anglo-Saxons”. A Russian flip of phrase that initially meant the US and its anglophobe allies led by Britain.

Who actually blew up the Nord Stream?

On the vital query of why Moscow would deliberately destroy a fuel pipeline through which it had invested billions over a few years, and which was a invaluable supply of revenue – by some estimates the pure fuel nonetheless saved in it value €800. million thi – Western journalists are at a complete loss.

A number of media shops have accordingly revealed lengthy articles Hypothesis on the intentions of the Kremlin to take action. However there has not essentially been a single comparative investigation into the explanations for Russia not doing so, of which there are clearly too many. There have additionally been no investigations of many actors with much more clear goals, far better advantages from doing so, and the flexibility to implement such a plan.

That is regardless of a number of pro-Western sources actively praising the sabotage. For instance, Radosaw Sikorski, a member of the European Parliament and former Polish Overseas Minister, took to Twitter instantly after and posted a photograph of the environmentally catastrophic fuel leak that resulted within the harm. His message was strict: “Thanks, USA.” Mysteriously, the put up has since been deleted. Perhaps somebody has a phrase.

In fact, the explosion occurred simply earlier than the opening of an alternate pipeline operating from Poland and Norway by way of Denmark that brings fuel from the North Sea as an alternative of Russia.

Moscow’s Everlasting Consultant to the United Nations Vasily Nebenzia claimed at a UN Safety Council assembly on Friday that the Nord Stream pipeline leak “helpful“To the US. He American provider of liquefied pure fuel (LNG)”ought to have a good time“Because the EU strikes away from Russian fuel.

Nebenzia mentioned that “It is senseless for us to destroy this venture with our personal fingers” And insisted that Russia, together with nations corresponding to Germany, Denmark and Sweden, ought to be a part of any investigation into the matter. “If anybody thinks that it’s attainable to conduct an investigation with out the participation of Russia, we now have causes to doubt the objectivity of this investigation,” He mentioned within the Safety Council.

‘Hello-tech crewless automobiles’

There may be additionally zero acknowledgment that Nord Stream was being attacked for a very long time main concern For Gazprom officers and Russian officers. Whereas Moscow’s proposals to equip Nord Stream 2 with safety measures, corresponding to an early warning system, had been drawn up because the Kremlin, which sought to broaden its army and intelligence infrastructure throughout Europe, did exactly The worry of what has occurred is effectively established.

in November 2015, a number of kilometers east of the Baltic island of आland and the place the pipeline runs, an armed remote-controlled mine disposal automobile was discovered throughout an annual routine verify of the construction. It was eliminated by the Swedish Armed Forces, however it’s by no means defined how the explosive-laden automobile ended up close to the Nord Stream, or when, why, who or what was working it.

Nevertheless, it’s a matter of file that the U.S. – that for many years Western European tasks to get Russian vitality, secretly and brazenly opposed aggressively – is a world chief in underwater drone innovation. In mid-June this 12 months, NATO’s annual maritime-focused BALTOPS train was carried out Off the coast of Denmark.

The US Navy used the occasion “As a chance to check rising expertise,” particularly “The most recent advances in unmanned underwater automobile mine searching expertise,” And “Show the effectiveness of the automobile in operational eventualities.” The train was carried out by the way, very near the place the Nord Stream strings are positioned, and the place there have been current eruptions.

It has additionally been confirmed that the Ukrainian military lately obtained Intensive coaching from the Royal Navy of Britain in the usage of “Excessive-tech crewless automobiles to assist hunt mines.” Troopers realized find out how to function the gear, which may function at depths of as much as 100 meters—roughly the depth of Nord Stream pipelines—and will use sensors to detect, find and detect mines. so the Ukrainian Navy can destroy them remotely with weapons. drone techniques

dare name it a conspiracy

Regardless of such clear grounds of doubt about Russia’s culpability in sabotage, there’s hypothesis on-line that Washington, or different hostile belligerents within the Ukrainian battle, could in truth be accountable. was dismissed In type of “conspiracy concept.,

What is not actually a conspiracy concept is that the CIA has a historical past of concentrating on pipelines, and would not give any consideration to the disastrous penalties of such actions. Certainly, within the early Nineteen Eighties, the company diabolical plan Thereby permitting Soviet brokers to acquire management software program from a Canadian firm that was embedded with a Computer virus virus.

It was used to drive pumps, generators and valves on the Trans-Siberian fuel pipeline. In June 1982, the CIA used a Computer virus to disrupt a routine strain take a look at by altering pump velocity and valve settings, so as to double the conventional quantity of strain launched, which was used to check pipe joints and welds. could face.

It produced an explosion with the facility of a three-kiloton nuclear warhead, considerably disrupting fuel provides to and from the Soviet Union, damaging Moscow’s international earnings and inflicting disruption to its home financial system. It additionally had a big psychological impression, because it left Soviet officers involved and uncertain which different gear – ​​whether or not domestically produced or foreign-bought – may likewise be catastrophically flawed.

It ought to be thought of suspicious sufficient that the CIA again in June apparently launched ,imprecise” However “tacticalA warning to a number of European nations, together with Germany, that each Nord Stream pipelines may very well be topic to assaults sooner or later. This data was neither publicized on the time nor prompted Berlin to take safety measures to forestall such an incident, is anybody’s guess.

It has not been confirmed whether or not the CIA recognized in its warnings which state or non-state actor was a possible or potential future legal, and the company – often at residence and overseas – blames Russia for any and all malfunctions. So fast to surrender – has been fully silent ever for the reason that explosions.

US officers have additionally been unusually reticent guilty Russia, or certainly any get together. White Home Spokesperson merely acknowledged On 27 September that: “Our companions are investigating this, so we stand able to help their efforts as soon as they full their investigation.”

And the very last thing to recollect is a remark made by President Joe Biden in early February, when he declared that if Russia invaded Ukraine, “There might be no Nord Stream 2 anymore” as “We’ll finish it.”

When requested how the US would have the ability to do that for the reason that venture was co-owned by Germany, Biden replied: “I promise you, we’ll have the ability to try this.”

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Comment